10.              Summary of environmental outcomes

Land Contamination

10.1          According to the SI for land contamination assessment, the subject shipyard was found to be contaminated with heavy metals, TPH, SVOCs and dioxins.

10.2          The volumes of contaminated soils in Areas 1, 2 and 3 are estimated to be 10,231501559,000m3100m3, 3115,2505,000m3, and 95612,600845000260m3 respectively.  The contaminated soil will be excavated and treated on site for metal-contaminated soil or off- site at TKW for other types of contaminated soil according to their nature of contamination.  The contamination level of groundwater was considered acceptable according to the risk -based standard,, therefore no in situ nor off-site treatment of groundwater is required.  E except that there is a small hot spot area which was shown to have notable free products.. 

10.3          Any contaminated soils and groundwater found within the site will be removed. Remediation systems will be effectively mitigated to prevent any potential negative impacts.  No contaminated soil and groundwater will remain after remediation to the agreed cleanup standards.  Free product encountered during excavation will be bailed out as much as possible, and will be disposed of as chemical waste.  As such, land contamination at CLS will not adversely affect the Theme Park development and will not pose significant heath threat to the future users of the site.

10.4          Compared to the future land users, construction workers will be more exposed to the contaminated material during excavation and remediation works.  The principal exposure routes for workers are ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact.  However, with the strict implementation and enforcement of safety measures, no excessive health risk will be posed on the workers.

10.5          The transport of contaminated soil is covered under ecologicalwaste impactmanagement.

10.6          Upon completion of the remediation works, all the contaminated soil excavated from the CLS will be decontaminated to the relevant cleanup standards.  With proper implementation of proposed mitigation measures, there will be no adverse environmental impacts on site workers and other sensitive receivers.  

 

Air Quality Impact

10.7          Dust will be generated during building demolition, slope improvement and remediation  and decommissioning of CLS, handling of general contaminated soil process at TKW and truck haulageCheoy Lee Shipyard.  At ground level, tThe predicted hourly and daily TSP concentrations at the worst affected elevation (1.5m above ground) are in the range of 7734 – 19241 mg m-3 and 71294108 mg m-3, respectively.  It has been predicted that Penny’s Bay GTP at CLS and dockyard building at TKW will receive higherst hourly and daily TSP levels.

10.8          Cumulative air quality impact from the decommissioning of CLS and other activities from the construction of the theme park at Penny’s Bay were predicted.  Maximum hourly and daily TSP concentrations are predicted at Penny’s Bay GTP and are about 26654 mg m-3 and 12547 mg m-3, respectively.   Thus, exceedances of the TSP criteria are not predicted.

10.9          Dioxins have been measured at the burn pit areas of CLS.  Modelling results indicated that the impacts at the ASRs satisfy the hourly criteria with the proposed excavation rates.  The HPCL stipulated in the APCO  would be exceeded if excavation is conducted within 150 m from the excavation pit.  The excavator rate should therefore be reduced when the excavation pit is close to the sensitive receiver.

10.1      The predicted maximum hourly and daily TSP concentrations are 87 mgm-3 and 81 mgm-3, respectively, at the ASRs at To Kau Wan.   As the air quality impacts at ASRs at To Kau Wan are low and the criteria are satisfied, adverse air quality impacts on sensitive receivers at both ground level and higher levels are therefore not expected.

10.10      TSP, TOC and, TAPs including dioxins would be emitted from the off site treatment facilities,area at To Kau Wan, their air quality impacts would comply with the air quality standards, with the control measures incorporated.

10.11      Air quality impacts associated with the decommissioning of treatment facilities at TKW site will be low and will complied with the air quality criteria.

10.12      The risk level associated with the operation of the treatment facilities has been assessed to be insignificant, and comply with international criteria.

   

Water Quality Impact

10.1Groundwater at the demolition site is contaminated with heavy metals.  Thus, direct discharge of groundwater collected from the dewatering process during excavation of contaminated soil is not expected.  If required, contaminated groundwater should be recharged back into the ground within the shipyard site.

10.1Any seepage of contaminated groundwater from CLS site into the adjacent drainage channel will be diluted by 104 times prior to discharge into the marine water.  The water quality within the drainage channel will still comply with the UK Water Quality Standards.  In addition, the existing seawall along the CLS site and the concrete wall of the drainage channel will act as additional physical barriers to lower the seepage of contaminated groundwater from the CLS site to the drainage channel.  It is therefore considered that the water quality of the identified water sensitive receivers in the vicinity of the CLS site will comply with the relevant water quality guidelines.

10.1Any surface run-off and on-site discharge from the land based demolition and construction activities and off-site remediation will be readily controlled by good site management practices and implementation of appropriate on-site measures.  Therefore, no adverse water quality is expected on the identified water quality sensitive receivers.

 

Waste Management

10.13      C&D wastes material will be generated during the demolition of the shipyard facilities and the estimated quantity is about .  It is estimated that about 10,000 m3 uncontaminated andof which 1,000 m3 is contaminated C&D wastes will be produced.  In addition, about 1,000 tonnes of steel and 5,000 m3 of general refuse will also be generated.   A top-down, non-blasting and “selective demolition” approach is selected.  It is considered that adverse waste impacts will not be generated provided that good site practices and waste handling recommended in Sections 6.69 to 6.107procedures are strictly followed.

10.14      During slope improvement phase, around 40,000m3 uncontaminated soil and 2,100m3 uncontaminated rock will be generated during excavation and soil nailing.  Such excavated material will be reused/ recycled as much as practical or.  Excavated material will be reused/ recycled within CLS as much as practical and the surplus  will be transported for public fillto public filling areas (PFAs) for public fill or restoring CLS.  As such, no residue waste impact is anticipated. 

10.15      During remediation, about 39,000m3 contaminated material will be excavated from Cheoy Lee Shipyard and will be transported to To Kau Wan for off-site treatment whereas 48,000m3 metal-contaminated soil will be treated on-site at CLS.  Environmental and safety measures have been recommended to minimise secondary environmental impacts and health risks during collection and transportation of contaminated soils from CLS to TKW.  After both on-site and off-site treatment, around 100,000m3 clean inert materials suitable for public filling will be generated.  The condensate of around 600m3 as the end product of the treatment and other chemical wastes will be collected and disposed of at the Chemical Waste Treatment CentreDuring remediation, about 135,000 m3 of soil contaminated with heavy metals, PAHs and dixoins will be excavated from Cheoy Lee Shipyard.  The contaminated soil will be transported to To Kau Wan for off-site treatment.  Environmental and safety measures have been recommended to minimise secondary environmental impacts and health risks during collection and transportation of contaminated soils from CLS to TKW.  Most of theAll soils after treatment will turn to clean inert materials suitable for public filling.  The condensate as the end product of the treatment and other chemical wastes will be collected and disposed of at the Chemical Waste Treatment Centre.  Thus, no residual waste impact and health risk concerns are expected.

10.16      During decommissioning of TKW, around 5,000m3 C&D material and 500 tonnes steel will be generated.  C&D material will be transported to PFAs and metal will be recycled, therefore, no residue impact is envisaged.   

10.17      The overall total of C&D material to be generated by this Project is estimated around 0.4Mm3.  The C&D material will be reused and recycled as far as practicable in the land formation works within CLS site so as to minimise the amount of C&D material to be disposed of at PFAs. 

10.18      Incident rate of road accidents for transportation of waste has been estimated to be acceptably low.  Notwithstanding this, mitigation measures have been proposed to minimise the impact of spillage of waste during transit. 

 

Water Quality Impact

10.19      Groundwater Heavy metals with levels higher than the screening levels for ariskt assessmentContaminants with levels higher than the discharge standards as stipulated in the TM-ES   theare found in groundwater at the CLSdemolition site is contaminated with heavy metals.  Thus, direct discharge of groundwater collected from the dewatering process during excavation of contaminated soil shall is not be allowedexpected.  Where necessary, If required, contaminated groundwater should be recharged back into the ground within the CLSshipyard site.

10.20      Any seepage of contaminated groundwater from CLS site into the adjacent drainage channel will be diluted by 88 times prior to discharge into the marine water.  The water quality within the drainage channel will still comply with the UK Water Quality Standards.  In addition, the high installation level of the drainage channel than the watertable and existing seawall along the CLS site and the concrete channel wall of the drainage channel will will act as additional physical barriers to prevent CLS lower the seepage of contaminated groundwater from from seeping to the the CLS site to the drainage channel.  It is therefore considered that the water quality of the identified water sensitive receivers in the vicinity of the CLS site will comply with the relevant water quality guidelines.  The remediation of CLS site will have an overall environmental benefit where after excavating CLS soils for treatment, the contamination source will be removed and stopped from polluting the groundwater.

10.21      Any surface run-off and on-site discharge from the CLS site, slope work construction site and treatment site at TKW will be readily controlled by good site management practices and implementation of appropriate on-site measures.  For potentially contaminated effluents, such as plant leachate, runoff from the thermal desorption plant, wheel wash water and decontamination water, centralised wastewater treatment units shall be provided at each of the Project site to the get rid of the contaminant from the effluent before being discharged. Therefore, no adverse water quality is expected on the identified water quality sensitive receivers.

 

Ecological Impact

10.22      The main potential ecological impacts resulting from the project were identified as:

 

·    Direct impacts to tall shrub/freshwater wetland habitats and associated rare/restricted and protected plant species near MTHS;

 

·Direct impacts to freshwater wetland habitats and associated rare/restricted and protected plant species near CLS;

 

·    Direct impacts to Rice Fish habitats and potentially Rice Fish populations;

 

·Impacts to marine organisms if the transported wastes are spilled into the sea

 

10.23      Measures to mitigate these impacts toupon ecologically sensitive receivers are detailed in S76section 8.   restricted/rare/, and further contingency plans are given in Appendices 8A and 8B.With the successful implementation of mitigation measures, residual impacts arising from the project will be ecologically acceptable.

10.1  With the successful implementation of mitigation measures, residual impacts arising from the project will be ecologically acceptable.

 

 

·Measures to mitigate theseIndirect impacts to potential Egretry at To Kau Wan.

10.1Mitigation impacts, and further contingency plans are given in Appendices 8A and 8B measures are recommended in Section 8.8.  With the proposedsuccessful implementation of mitigation measures in place, residual impacts arising from the project will be minimal and ecologically acceptable.

Impact on Cultural Heritage

10.24      The archaeological survey of CLS revealed that the area has high archaeological values. Many artifacts of different periods, including the Late Neolithic period, Bronze Age, Tang Dynasty, Song Dynasty, Ming Dynasty and Ching Dynasty have been recovered in the three demarcated zones along the ancient coastal area.  As Penny’s Bay is blocked by the surrounding hills and is remote from the city centre, the cultural heritage would not be damaged easily.  The recovered cultural remains therefore have high archaeological value.

10.25      Infrastructure works at the three democratic archaeological zones shall be avoided to ensure the potential impact to any surviving archaeological remains is kept in an absolute minimum.  The CLS have been contaminated with the shipyard activities, and decontamination works are required. The potential Filling at the archaeological potential site where are not subject to rescue excavation shall be covered by impermeable sheeting plastic sheetsbefore filling.  Detailed design of filling work or ground level adjustment work should consider diversion of site runoff to prevent any waterlogged conditions.  For areas where preservation in situ is not possible, the impact on the heritage resources should be mitigated by rescue excavation.  All rescue works have to be completed prior to the decontaminated works of CLS. Decontamination works such as excavation will unavoidable ineritably damage the archaeological deposits and preservation in situ is therefore not feasible.  The archaeological deposits at the three zones at CLS shall therefore be mitigated by rescue excavation.